Intellectual Property

IP Law Daily
  • March 21, 2017

    Laches may not be invoked as a defense against a patent infringement claim for damages brought within the Patent Act’s six-year statute of limitations, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled, in a 7-1 opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito. In an infringement suit brought by adult incontinence products manufacturers SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag and SCA Personal Care, Inc. (collectively, "SCA"),...

  • March 20, 2017

    Plaintiff Mobile Telecommunications Technologies, LLC ("MTel"), which asserted three patents generally related to wireless telecommunications against several defendants, was not required to plead compliance with Section 287 of the Patent Act relating to the limited damages a patent owner who fails to mark their products may recover, the federal district court in Wilmington, Delaware, has decided. In addition, the contention...

  • March 17, 2017

    In a trademark infringement dispute between two Texas oil equipment manufacturing companies using the name "Streamline," a jury’s infringement verdict was supported by sufficient evidence at trial, according to the U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans. However, the jury’s damages award was not supported by the evidence and the district court erred by not granting the defendant’s post-trial motion...

  • March 16, 2017

    Substantial evidence supported an Oregon jury’s infringement verdict and $36 million damages award to Mentor Graphics for rival Synopsys’ infringement of simulation/emulation technology patent, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has decided. The district court’s denial of judgment as a matter of law was upheld. However, because the district court erred by precluding evidence of Synopsys’ willful...

Computer Law, Intellectual Property, and Privacy Law (CLIPP) Advisory Council

The Computer Law, Intellectual Property, and Privacy Law (CLIPP) Advisory Council is composed of distinguished legal experts in these related legal fields. Established in 2002, the CLIPP Advisory Council provides guidance to Wolters Kluwer on the opportunities, challenges, and practical needs of legal professionals who focus on intellectual property, privacy, and Internet/technology law.

Learn More
Author Spotlight

Michael L. Kiklis

Mr. Kiklis is a patent attorney with 20 years of experience in all areas of patent law. He has procured numerous patents, litigated patents, and challenged patents in various proceedings at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). He holds both a bachelor’s degree and a master’s degree in computer science from the University of Massachusetts at Lowell and Boston University, respectively. Mr. Kiklis received his J.D., magna cum laude, from Syracuse University College of Law.

Learn More
Featured Product
WK Trademark Navigator

Whether you are representing emerging companies, small businesses or multinational corporations, managing multiple trademark portfolios simultaneously across multiple industries and jurisdictions is daunting enough, let alone when the complexity of the trademark prosecution process is added to your daily workflow.

Unfortunately, the information and tools you need to manage your practice effectively in the PTO and before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) are often found in multiple sources and various media—costing those you represent valuable time and money.

Now there is a new solution— the WK Trademark Navigator™ from Wolters Kluwer.

Learn More