Antitrust Law Daily
A complete daily report of antitrust law news that affects your practice, your clients and your world.
The Antitrust & Competition Law Daily Reporting Suite
Timely, authoritative resources that enable you to efficiently and confidently address client needs by keeping you current on daily news and changing regulations.
Breaking news and expert analysis
- View full summaries of federal and state court decisions
- Access full text of legislative and regulatory developments
- Customize your daily email by topic and/or jurisdiction
- Search archives for stories of interest
Expert to expert—every day
- Get expert analysis written by subject matter specialists—created by attorneys for attorneys
- Track law firms and organizations in the headlines with our new “Who’s in the News” feature
- Promote your firm with our permissions policy.
24/7 access for a 24/7 world
- Forward information with special copyright permissions, encouraging collaboration between counsel and colleagues
- Save time with mobile apps for your iPhone, iPad, or Android
- Access all links from any mobile device without being prompted for user name and password
Arbitrability determination not delegated to arbitrator, due to carve-out clause
The arbitration agreement’s clause excluding actions seeking injunctive relief from arbitration meant that for any action containing a claim for injunctive relief, the gateway arbitrability...
FCC chair moves for vote to approve T-Mobile/Sprint combination
Antitrust chief commends agency on moving forward with completion of review.
‘NFL Sunday Ticket’ subscribers get another shot at antitrust suit against NFL, DirecTV
A putative class of subscribers to DirecTV’s ‘NFL Sunday Ticket’ adequately alleged injury to competition, antitrust standing. Sherman Act, Section 2 claims also revived.
Dismissal of bid rigging claim involving church’s property lease affirmed
The Tenth Circuit also granted sanctions of double the church’s costs in an appeal that was deemed completely frivolous, even for a party acting pro se.
Price-fixing case against top pork producers fails for lack of parallel conduct fails for lack of parallel conduct
The plaintiffs made strong allegations of plus factors for the pork market, but failed to adequately allege parallel conduct, because they relied on industry-wide data showing production decreases.