Securities Regulation Daily House passes financial services reform bill; presidential signature expected
Tuesday, May 22, 2018

House passes financial services reform bill; presidential signature expected

By Richard A. Roth, J.D., and Mark S. Nelson, J.D.

The House of Representatives has passed a bill that will loosen many of the post-recession restrictions that were imposed on the financial services industry by the Dodd-Frank Act. S. 2155, the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, is intended principally to assist community banks, but significant provisions will change which bank holding companies are subject to enhanced prudential standards, benefiting only much larger banks. The bill also contains provisions dealing with algorithmic trading in securities markets, the financial exploitation of seniors, cybersecurity, and hedge fund names. The bill passed by a vote of 258 to 159, with 33 Democrats voting for passage. S. 2155 now will be transmitted to President Donald Trump for his expected signature.

Despite initial Republican leadership threats not to move the bill unless provisions of bills passed earlier by the House were incorporated, S. 2155 was passed with no amendments to the version passed by the Senate, with bipartisan support, on March 14. A Trump administration policy statement has said that the bill will be signed into law.

The main provisions of the bill address:

  • community bank capital and leverage;
  • mortgage lending;
  • consumer protection;
  • financial stability; and
  • securities laws.

Capital and leverage. S. 2155 provisions that affect community bank capital and leverage requirements and restrictions may have the most effect on the profitability of these smaller banks. The bill responds to complaints that Dodd-Frank unfairly, and perhaps disproportionately, applies financial stability-related rules to banks that are too small to pose a threat to the financial system.

Section 201 directs the Federal Reserve Board, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to set a tangible equity to average total consolidated asset ratio of between 8 percent and 10 percent for banks with less than $10 billion in consolidated assets. A bank that remains below that threshold will be deemed to meet capital and leverage requirements if it satisfied the ratio.

Section 403 permits community banks to count investment-grade, liquid, and readily marketable municipal securities as assets that satisfy the liquidity coverage ratio rule.

Also, Sec. 402 says that a custodial bank’s deposits with a Federal Reserve Bank or other qualifying central bank will be excluded when the bank’s supplementary leverage ratio is calculated. This will mainly benefit large, internationally active banking organizations, and it is expected to exempt them from SLR requirements.

Mortgage lending. One of the ways that S. 2155 is intended to help community banks is by easing the path for mortgage lending, specifically by broadening what is considered to be a qualified mortgage that satisfies ability-to-repay standards. Section 101creates a lower threshold for loans by banks with less than $10 billion in assets that the lending bank keeps in its portfolio. These loans will be considered qualified mortgages if:

  • there are no prohibited prepayment penalties;
  • the points and fees do not exceed 3 percent of the loan amount;
  • there are no negative amortization or interest-only payment options; and
  • fixed-rate loans meet specified underwriting standards.

Also, Secs. 102 and 103 reduce appraisal requirements; Sec. 108 creates an exception from escrow account requirements; and Sec. 104 reduces Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data collection duties for very small banks and credit unions that make a small number of mortgage loans and have adequate Community Reinvestment Act ratings.

Consumer protection. Consumer protection improvements in S. 2155 include a requirement in Sec. 301 that consumer reporting agencies place and remove security freezes on consumer files free of charge. Also, there are four statutory amendments that will benefit servicemembers and their families. These include:

  1. a restriction on the ability of consumer reporting agencies to report unpaid medical debt (Sec. 302);
  2. a requirement that they provide free credit monitoring services to all active duty servicemembers (Sec. 302);
  3. a permanent extension to one year after the end of active duty in how long a mortgage creditor must wait before foreclosing on a mortgage (Sec. 313); and
  4. a restriction on the ability of the Veterans Administration to guarantee refinanced mortgages, in order to ensure that refinancing benefits the servicemember (Sec. 309).

Financial stability. One of the more controversial provisions of S. 2155 changes the asset threshold for the automatic application of enhanced prudential standards. Currently, banks with more than $50 billion in assets are covered, but Sec. 401 increases the threshold to $250 billion. However, the Fed retains the ability to apply enhanced prudential standards to banks with assets of more than $100 billion if doing so is deemed necessary. In any case, the Fed will have the authority to tailor its requirements to each bank’s business model and risk profile.

There will be fewer stress tests performed. Company-performed stress tests will be required only of institutions with more than $250 billion in assets, as opposed to the current $10 billion. Other than for institutions that exceed the $250 billion asset threshold, stress test frequency is changed from "annual" to "periodic."

Also, stress tests will be simplified by the removal of the "adverse" scenario. Only two scenarios will be called for—"baseline" and "severely adverse."

Another change, made by Sec. 270, will change the Fed’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement to allow higher debt levels for BHCs with up to $3 billion in assets, up from the current $1 billion.

Volcker Rule revisions. Two parts of S. 2155 will affect the Volcker Rule directly. The Volcker Rule restricts banks’ ability to engage in some proprietary trading or investment fund activities. Section 203fully exempts from the Volcker Rule banks that have less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets and total trading assets and liabilities of no more than 5 percent of those consolidated assets. Section 204 eliminates a Dodd-Frank ban so that some hedge and private equity funds will be able to share the name of a bank-affiliated investment advisor.

Capital formation. In addition, S. 2155 would aid capital formation by opening Regulation A to more companies and by closing a gap in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (JOBS) Act. It also would require the SEC to have greater role in the work of an advisory body on capital formation issues.

Section 508 directs the Commission to remove the requirement under Rule 251 of Regulation A that an issuer of securities must satisfy a variety of requirements, including that the issuer is not subject to reporting under Exchange Act Sections 13 or 15(d) immediately before the offering. Rule 257 also would have to be amended to conform to the revision to Rule 251 (See H.R. 2864, which passed the House 403-3).

Section 504 includes the Supporting America’s Innovators Act of 2017 (See, H.R. 1219 and S. 444) and would amend the Investment Company Act to fix an oversight by the JOBS Act that left in place a 1940s-era investor threshold that hinders investments by venture capital funds. Specifically, S. 2155 would amend the exemption in Investment Company Act Section 3(c)(1) to apply to a qualifying venture capital fund with up to 250 persons. "Qualifying venture capital fund" would be defined as a venture capital fund with no more than $10 million in aggregate capital contributions and uncalled committed capital, as periodically indexed for inflation.

Under Section 503, the Commission would have to review findings and recommendations submitted by the Government-Business Forum on Capital Formation and publicly disclose any action the Commission plans to take on any recommendation. The House passed identical legislation (H.R. 1312) by a vote of 406-0, while S. 416 passed the Senate by unanimous consent.

Investment companies and advisers. Under S. 2155, closed-end companies would get broader proxy powers, while Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories would achieve regulatory parity with mainland U.S. rules for investment companies. Certain hedge funds also would be allowed to have names that would be prohibited under current banking regulations.

Section 509 contains a provision that would allow closed-end companies to use offering and proxy rules currently available to operating companies. The SEC would have to adopt regulations to implement this provision within two years of enactment. The Commission also would have to mull the amount of disclosure needed to be a well-known seasoned issuer. Moreover, the bill provision includes text that tracks an amendment offered by Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill) to the equivalent House bill, which would extend parity to interval funds that make periodic repurchase offers. However, a registered closed-end company could still invoke Securities Act Rule 482 with respect to the distribution of sales materials.

Section 506 contains text equivalent to the U.S. Territories Investor Protection Act of 2016 (See H.R. 1366 and S. 484), which strikes the text of Investment Company Act Section 6(a)(1) to bring U.S. territories within the Investment Company Act via a transitional period that the Commission may extend for up to six years. A similar bill previously sailed through the House Financial Services Committee and was approved by the House by voice vote. The Senate likewise approved an identical bill by unanimous consent.

As noted above, Sec. 204 of S. 2155 would permit a hedge fund or private equity fund to have the same name as a banking entity that is an investment adviser to the fund, provided that the investment adviser is not an insured depository institution or bank holding company, does not have the same name as an insured depository institution or bank holding company, and the name does not use the word "bank."

Technology provisions. Two provisions in the bill address technology developments. Under Section 502, the SEC would have to submit a report to Congress on algorithmic trading. Likewise, the Treasury Department would have to report to Congress under Section 216 regarding the preparedness of federal banking regulators and the SEC to handle cybersecurity issues.

Registration exemption—compensatory benefit plans. Section 507 directs the Commission, within 60 days of enactment, to revise Securities Act Rule 701(e) to raise the additional disclosure threshold with respect to compensatory benefit plans from $5 million to $10 million, adjusted for inflation (See H.R. 1343, which passed the House 331-87, and S. 488, which passed the Senate by unanimous consent).

SEC administration. Under Section 505, which contains the Securities and Exchange Commission Overpayment Credit Act (See H.R. 1257 and S. 462), and which cleared the House FSC59-0 and passed the Senate by unanimous consent, the SEC would have to credit future fee assessments of national securities exchanges and associations for overpayments the exchanges or associations made and informed the SEC of within a ten-year period. The provision, however, would apply only to fees required to be paid before enactment.

Protection of seniors. Section 303 would protect employees of financial institutions from liability when they report the suspected financial exploitation of a senior citizen to a covered agency. The provision would apply to individuals and to "covered financial institutions," which term includes investment advisers, broker-dealers, and transfer agents. The provision also would impose training and recordkeeping requirements. The provision defines "covered agency" to include state securities regulators, the SEC, and registered securities associations.

White paper. S. 2155 is analyzed in detail in the Wolters Kluwer white paper "Is Senate reg relief a scalpel or hatchet to Dodd-Frank?"

MainStory: TopStory AlternativeInvestmentFunds BrokerDealers CorporateFinance CorporateGovernance CorpGovNews GCNNews CyberPrivacyFeed DoddFrankAct ExchangesMarketRegulation FederalPreemption Securities FinancialIntermediaries HedgeFundsNews InvestmentAdvisers InvestmentCompanies JOBSAct PrivateEquityNews PublicCompanyReportingDisclosure RiskManagement SecuritiesOfferings

Back to Top

Interested in submitting an article?

Submit your information to us today!

Learn More
Reading Securities Regulation Daily on tablet

Securities Regulation Law Daily: Breaking legal news at your fingertips

Sign up today for your free trial to this daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys. Stay up to date on securities regulation legal matters with same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity with easy access through email or mobile app.

Free Trial Learn More