By Kathleen Bianco, J.D.
Final settlement agreement provides for inspection, repair, or replacement of allegedly defective revolvers and an inconvenience payment for class members who submit firearms for inspection.
A settlement agreement between the owners of a certain class of firearms manufactured between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2017 and the firearm manufacturer has been granted final approval by a federal district court in Florida. The settlement applies to defined class members, subject to an opt-out provision and outlined exclusions (Burrow v. Forjas Taurus S.A., September 6, 2019, Torres, E.).
Two class action complaints asserting that certain Rossi brand .38 Special and .357 Magnum revolvers manufactured by Forjas Taurus S.A. were defective in that the weapon fired when dropped were filed in federal district courts in Florida and Alaska in 2016. The named gun owners each filed a separate class action suit against Forjas Taurus S.A., the Brazil-based manufacturer of the revolvers at issue, and Braztech International, L.C., the Florida-based distributor and seller of the revolvers, arguing that all of the affected revolvers contained at least one defect in the alignment of the hammer’s rebound slide seat and that some of the revolvers contained a second defect that resulted in the "drop-fire" incidents. The suits were subsequently consolidated in the action filed in Florida.
Prior proceedings. After extensive discovery and prolonged settlement negotiations, the parties executed a settlement agreement that was submitted to the court for preliminary approval. After reviewing the proposed agreement, which was found to be fair and reasonable, the court issued a preliminary approval and conditionally certified the settlement class; approved the notice plan; set a deadline of July 15, 2019, for class members to opt out or object to the settlement; appointed Notice and Claims administrators; and authorized the defendants to continue the early warning program and to begin providing the enhanced warranty service prior to final approval of the settlement [see Products Liability Law Daily’s March 18, 2019 analysis].
Final approval. In reaching its conclusion to grant final approval of the settlement agreement, the court looked at the standards established for judicial approval and found them to be satisfied. Furthermore, the court noted that the low opt-out and objection rate weighed in favor of approval. Out of an estimated 255,000 potential settlement class members, only 11 filed complete and timely opt-outs and only one objection was filed. As to the sole objection, which related to the amount of the inconvenience payment, the court determined that the objection did not warrant withholding final approval and certification of the settlement.
Term of settlement. The finalized settlement agreement applies to all individuals in the United States, including its territories and possessions, who own one or more of the Class Revolvers as of the date of the preliminary approval of the agreement. The Class Revolvers include all Rossi brand.357 Magnum and.38 Special revolvers of the following models—R35102, R35202, R85104, R97104, R46202, and R46102—manufactured by Forjas Taurus between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2017, as indicated by the serial number stamped on the frame of the revolver beginning with the letters Y, Z, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, or K.
The settlement agreement includes four major components, including: (1) a safety warning; (2) an enhanced warranty; (3) an enhanced warranty service; and (4) an inconvenience payment. The enhanced warranty and warranty service provisions permit owners of the Class Revolvers to submit their firearms for a one-time warranty service that includes free shipping, inspection, repair and/or replacement, certification, and cleaning. Class members who partake of this enhanced warranty service within one year of the effective date of the settlement will also be eligible for an inconvenience payment of $50 per class member.
Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Class Counsel has reserved the right to seek a reasonable service award, not to exceed $7,500.00 for each class representative, and to petition for an award of attorney fees, not to exceed $5,553,000.00. The agreement also outlines, among other things, the process by which notification will be provided to potential class members, the method by which class members may opt out of the agreement, and the term of the release from liability for the manufacturer.
The case is No. 16-21606-Civ-TORRES.
Attorneys: Brannon J. Buck (Badham & Buck, LLC) for William Burrow. Colin Dang Delaney (Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP) for Forjas Taurus, S.A. and Braztech International, L.C.
Companies: Forjas Taurus, S.A; Braztech International, LC
MainStory: TopStory SettlementAgreementsNews WeaponsFirearmsNews DesignManufacturingNews DamagesNews FloridaNews
Interested in submitting an article?
Submit your information to us today!Learn More
Product Liability Law Daily: Breaking legal news at your fingertips
Sign up today for your free trial to this daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys. Stay up to date on product liability legal matters with same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity with easy access through email or mobile app.