An issue brief from the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) summarizes input and recommendations from governors and insurance commissioners in 35 states regarding health care reform, including their view on repeal and replacement of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) (P.L. 111-148) and changes Congress is considering to the structure and financing of Medicaid. KFF’s analysis in its issue brief shows that state leaders have varied views on ACA repeal and replacement and potential changes to Medicaid. While many of their views fall along party lines, some views are shared across parties and those who support and oppose repeal.
On December 2, 2016, Republican House leaders sent a letter to state governors and insurance commissioners seeking input and recommendations based on their experience overseeing the health insurance markets and Medicaid programs within their respective states. Responses were due by January 6, 2017.
The respondents included a mix of governors and insurance commissioners in 34 states and the Mayor of the District of Columbia. Among the 35 responding states, 18 had a Republican governor at the time of the response and 17 had a Democratic governor. Three-fourths (26 of 35) of the states had adopted the ACA Medicaid expansion (ACA, section 2001) to low-income adults.
ACA repeal. The KFF analysis found that 23 of 35 responses cited some positive effects of the ACA. This group included all respondents from Democratic-led states and six of the 18 respondents from Republican-led states. The respondents pointed to several positive effects, including gains in coverage, reduced uninsured rates, increased affordability for subsidized consumers, increased access and utilization of care, and reductions to uncompensated care for hospitals.
Challenges with the ACA were cited in 21 of the 35 responses. All 18 respondents from states with Republican governors cited challenges, as well as respondents from three states with Democratic governors. Respondents pointed out several issues, including the following:
- the ACA has shifted too much control of health insurance to the federal government and that greater authority and flexibility should be given back to states to regulate their insurance markets;
- the ACA has caused insurers to leave the individual market leading to more limited access and choice for consumers;
- continuing premium increases;
- the prevalence of narrow network plans that limit access to providers; and
- the sustainability of Medicaid due to the significant growth in enrollment under the ACA Medicaid expansion.
Across both parties, 29 of 35 respondents were concerned about repealing the ACA. All 17 responses from states with a Democratic governor noted concerns, as did 12 of the 18 responses from states with a Republican governor. The concerns included potential coverage losses for individuals covered through the marketplaces or Medicaid expansion, marketplace instability caused by repeal, the loss of federal funding, the shift of cost to the states, disruption of delivery and payment reform initiatives, and increased administrative costs.
Medicaid financing structure. The Trump administration and Republican Congressional plans have called for Medicaid to be financed through block grants or per capita caps. In exchange for caps, the states would get increased flexibility to administer their programs.
The KFF analysis found that 18 of 35 of the responses included comments on Medicaid financing, particularly the move to a block grant or per capita cap financing structure. Twelve of the 18 respondents indicated concerns about a capped financing structure. Ten of the 12 respondents expressing concerns were from states with a Democratic governor.
Respondents in six of the 18 Republican states indicated general support for capped financing, but most included suggestions on how a cap should be structured. Their suggestions included:
- limiting cap financing to only certain parts of the Medicaid population (e.g., excluding seniors and people with disabilities);
- having the cap allow for enhanced funding during economic downturns;
- reviewing the cap annually; and
- ensuring that the cap does not disadvantage states that have not taken up certain program options, like the Medicaid expansion.
Medicaid flexibility. Fourteen of the 35 responses, most from Republican states, indicated an interest in increased state Medicaid flexibility.The suggested areas for increased flexibility included premiums and cost sharing, benefits, eligibility (including enrollment caps, work requirements, income standards), provider payments, and delivery systems.
Section 1115 waivers. Republican respondents in 10 of the 35 states cited interest in increased flexibility and streamlined processes to make changes under Social Security Act §1115 (Section 1115 waivers). These comments included providing a pathway for waivers to become permanent, eliminating or reducing renewal requirements for waivers, allowing other states to replicate waiver changes approved for other states, providing expedited and streamlined approval processes for waivers and state plan amendments, and reductions in regulatory requirements and state reporting requirements.
Section 1332 waivers. Most respondents (20 of the 35) did not provide comments on ACA section 1332 waivers for state innovation.Seven respondents indicated they are or would potentially consider pursuing a 1332 waiver or that they supported maintaining the 1332 waiver authority. Eight respondents indicated that they are not planning to utilize this authority. Several respondents indicated that the current rules related to 1332 waivers are too restrictive, limiting their interest in pursuing a waiver.
Companies: Kaiser Family Foundation
IndustryNews: NewsStory NewsFeed AccessNews CHIPNews CostSharingNews DemonstrationProjectNews EnrollmentNews EmployerMandateNews EssentialBenefitNews GeneralNews HealthInsuranceExchangeNews IndividualMandateNews InsurerNews MedicaidNews MedicaidExpansionNews PremiumNews QualityNews FedTracker
Interested in submitting an article?
Submit your information to us today!Learn More