Employment Law Daily Justices face public-sector agency shop arguments in Friedrichs
News
Monday, January 11, 2016

Justices face public-sector agency shop arguments in Friedrichs

By Pamela Wolf, J.D. The High Court will hear arguments in a case of great interest to labor and employment practitioners, particularly those who are concerned about unions or have public-sector clients. The Court’s calendar shows that on January 11, the first day of the next session, the parties in a closely watched case, Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association (Dkt. No. 14-915), will offer their best arguments as to whether public-sector agency shop arrangements should be outlawed. Public-sector agency shops. In Friedrichs, the parties and the Justices will address the contentious question of whether state employees may be compelled to pay so-called “fair share” fees to public-sector unions—a question that is a matter of survival for public-sector unions. Many labor and employment practitioners expected the Justices to take on the issue in the wake of its Harris v. Quinn ruling a year ago, which questioned precedent in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education permitting such agency shop arrangements. The Court now has an opportunity to squarely re-examine that precedent. The plaintiffs sued the teachers union, asserting that the state’s agency shop arrangement and opt-out procedures for non-chargeable union expenditures violate their free speech and association rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The case directly implicates Abood, so much so that a district court in California entered judgment on the pleadings in favor of the CTA and the Ninth Circuit summarily affirmed. The parties will offer argument on the questions of whether:
  • Abood should be overruled and public-sector agency shop arrangements invalidated on First Amendment grounds.
  • It is a First Amendment violation to require public employees to affirmatively object to subsidizing non-chargeable speech by public-sector unions rather than requiring them to affirmatively consent to such speech.

Interested in submitting an article?

Submit your information to us today!

Learn More
Employment Law Daily

Employment Law Daily: Breaking legal news at your fingertips

Sign up today for your free trial to this daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys. Stay up to date on employment legal matters with same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity with easy access through email or mobile app.

Free Trial Learn More