Banking and Finance Law Daily RushCard services interruption to cost companies $13 million
Wednesday, February 1, 2017

RushCard services interruption to cost companies $13 million

By Richard A. Roth, J.D.

Mastercard International and prepaid card issuer UniRush have agreed to pay a total of $13 million to settle Consumer Financial Protection Bureau charges based on an October 2015 disruption in RushCard services. According to the CFPB, more than 45,000 consumers were in some way affected by problems that arose when UniRush changed its payment processor to Mastercard. The two companies are jointly liable for approximately $10 million in consumer redress and an additional $3 million civil penalty. The settlement does not include any admission of wrongdoing by either company.

Service breakdown. Bureau Director Richard Cordray said that tens of thousands of users were locked out of their RushCard accounts, with service disruptions in some cases lasting for weeks. Many RushCard users rely on the card to pay basic living expenses because they have no bank accounts, Cordray said, and their inability to make payments resulted in late fees and penalties.

UniRush also failed to process direct deposits for approximately 45,000 consumers and improperly returned deposits for others, Cordray said. This left consumers unable to gain access to their funds.

On the other hand, some deposits were erroneously posted twice, and some debits were not posted in a timely manner, Cordray charged. This led users to believe they had larger balances than was true, which in turn induced them to overdraw their accounts. UniRush compounded the problem by using subsequent deposits to repay the overdrafts without notifying the customers.

UniRush’s customer service personnel were inadequate to handle the problems, the bureau added.

Mastercard alleged failures. The consent order against Mastercard is based on what the bureau described as the company’s inadequate preparation for the change-over. The company’s testing did not accurately simulate the conditions of the change-over, which generated an overly optimistic estimate of how quickly the process would be completed. The company rejected UniRush’s request for additional testing of one necessary data file that Mastercard knew was central to a successful change-over, the bureau said.

Mastercard also did not communicate adequately with UniRush, the CFPB added.

Consent order. Under the consent order, entered under the bureau’s authority to act against unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices, the two companies are permitted to decide between themselves how to allocate liability for the $13 million in payments. However, the CFPB is not bound by their agreement, leaving the bureau able to collect the full amount should either company default.

Mastercard is required to create procedures to avoid similar problems in future change-overs, while UniRush must create an incident tracking system and a disaster recovery plan. Both companies are to implement improved compliance programs.

Companies: Mastercard International Inc.; UniRush LLC

MainStory: TopStory CFPB ChecksElectronicTransfers CreditDebitGiftCards EnforcementActions FinTech UDAAP

Back to Top

Interested in submitting an article?

Submit your information to us today!

Learn More
Banking and Finance Law Daily

Banking and Finance Law Daily: Breaking legal news at your fingertips

Sign up today for your free trial to this daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys. Stay up to date on banking and finance legal matters with same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity with easy access through email or mobile app.

Free Trial Learn More