Challenge to the proposed merger of Philadelphia's Jefferson Health and Albert Einstein Healthcare Network comes four years after FTC and state successfully blocked the combination of Penn State Hershey Medical Center and Pinnacle Health System in Harrisburg area.
The FTC has moved to block the proposed merger of Jefferson Health and Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, two leading providers of inpatient general acute care hospital services and inpatient acute rehabilitation services in the Philadelphia area. The agency announced on February 27 that it has issued an administrative complaint alleging that the proposed merger would reduce competition in both Philadelphia and nearby Montgomery County and has authorized staff to seek a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction to prevent the parties from consummating the merger and to maintain the status quo pending the administrative trial (In the Matter of Thomas Jefferson University and Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, FTC File No. 181 0128).
In September 2018, Einstein Healthcare and Jefferson (Philadelphia University + Thomas Jefferson University) announced that they had entered into a binding definitive agreement to integrate into a single healthcare system. Talks of a combination reportedly began in 2017.
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals has 908 licensed acute care beds, with services provided at five primary locations. Einstein Healthcare Network is also the largest independent academic medical center in the Philadelphia region. It provides services through Einstein Medical Center Elkins Park, Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia, Einstein Medical Center Montgomery, MossRehab, and Willowcrest outpatient facilities throughout the region.
According to the FTC, the proposed merger would eliminate the robust competition between Jefferson and Einstein for inclusion in health insurance companies’ hospital networks to the detriment of patients. As a result of the merger, the parties would control at least 60% of the inpatient general acute care (GAC) hospital services market in and around North Philadelphia, and at least 45% of the GAC market in and around Montgomery County, the agency contends.
Further, the merged parties would control at least 70% of the inpatient acute rehabilitation services market in the Philadelphia area, according to the FTC. Inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) provide intensive multi-disciplinary rehabilitation services to patients previously treated at GAC hospitals who are recovering from serious, acute conditions such as a stroke, traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury. Collectively, Jefferson and Einstein operate six of the eight IRFs in the Philadelphia area in and around Einstein’s flagship Moss at Elkins Park facility.
An administrative trial would begin as early as September 2020. The request for preliminary relief will be filed in the federal district court in Philadelphia.
Earlier Third Circuit merger win for FTC and state. An appeal of a federal district court decision as to the preliminary injunctive relief would be decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. Just four years ago, the Third Circuit sided with the FTC and the State of Pennsylvania when they challenged the merger of Penn State Hershey Medical Center and Pinnacle Health System in the Harrisburg area.
The federal district court in Harrisburg had denied the FTC’s request for a preliminary injunction, finding that the agency failed to meet its burden to properly define the relevant geographic market. On appeal, a Third Circuit panel held that the lower court erred in finding that the FTC too narrowly defined the geographic market. Further, the appellate court concluded that the FTC had demonstrated that the proposed transaction would be presumptively anticompetitive and that the hospitals failed to rebut that presumption. Thus, the district court’s order was reversed, and the lower court was directed to enter the preliminary injunction. Penn State Hershey Medical Center and Pinnacle Health ultimately abandoned the deal. The Third Circuit precedent could embolden the agency in its effort to block the pending Jefferson/Einstein deal.
Response from the merging parties. In response to the FTC’s complaint, the parties have said that they "will take some time to review the challenge to better understand both their position and how to best move forward." The hospital operators went on to say: "we have presented a strong and comprehensive case as to how the merger would benefit the patients we serve and advance our academic mission without reducing competition for healthcare services."
Companies: Jefferson Health; Albert Einstein Healthcare Network
MainStory: TopStory AcquisitionsMergers Antitrust FederalTradeCommissionNews
Interested in submitting an article?
Submit your information to us today!Learn More
Antitrust Law Daily: Breaking legal news at your fingertips
Sign up today for your free trial to this daily reporting service created by attorneys, for attorneys. Stay up to date on antitrust legal matters with same-day coverage of breaking news, court decisions, legislation, and regulatory activity with easy access through email or mobile app.